Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650-E WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-E WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '24 at 18:06
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G-$149
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.55 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 66.4
1-Core 175
2-Core 293
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 706
72% 581 Pts
64-Core 841
52% 841 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$268
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 116
Parallax 121
105% 122 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 94.1
Splatting 86.4
81% 101 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2093 2104 1962 2179 2219 2240 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,747
Write 2,296
Mixed 1,969
SusWrite 2,133
462% 2,036 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 63.8
221% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 503
DQ Mixed 629
465% 617 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 296%
Great: 417%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
466GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 859 436 435 436 436 437 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,114
Write 1,208
Mixed 1,067
SusWrite 507
219% 974 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 62.3
206% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 799
DQ Write 535
DQ Mixed 695
511% 676 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 170%
Great: 237%
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ML6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 120 128 118 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
70% Good
Read 120
Write 124
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 124
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70%
Great: 75%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
851GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 35 109 43 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 15.5
Write 19.5
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 39.9
16% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ML6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 123 120 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 114
Write 123
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 122
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 75%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
405GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 51
Write 35.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 37.7
49% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
77% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 45%
WD Elements 25A3 20TB
15.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 12 13 6.5 6.3 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Read 50.1
Write 5.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 8.3
16% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 9.14%
Great: 118%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 1TB
930GB free, PID 7410
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 67
Write 19.6
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 36.9
46% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
73% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6000 C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
121% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 42.7
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 38.6
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 39.4
110% 38.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 121%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 54.6" 1280 720 XXX2851 Beyond TV
Typical TUF GAMING B650-E WIFI Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 250%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 255%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-E WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,585
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback