Today's hottest deals

HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '24 at 17:37
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 123
53% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 485
43% 365 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 475.14
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 10.5
6% 9.57 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 867 352 350 340 349 349 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
74GB free
Firmware: 010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 143 142 142 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 298
Write 176
Mixed 216
SusWrite 143
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 15.7
52% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 54.2
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 46
35% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 69%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$40
101GB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 126 125 126 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 98.7
Write 88.4
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 126
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$112
4.5TB free
Firmware: DA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 165 163 164 163 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 88%
Asmedia USB 3.0 Device 4TB
16GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 78 82 81 78 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 47.2
Write 63.1
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 75.6
49% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 72%
Asmedia USB 3.0 Device 500GB
26GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 112 114 117 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 116
Write 105
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 113
72% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 60%
ASMT 2115 1TB
52GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 91 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 109
Write 84.9
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 92.3
114% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 28.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 19% 16 122 57 60 27" 1920 1027 ACI27A1 VS278
Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback