Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83FQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83FQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '24 at 22:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12450HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 69.3
1-Core 172
2-Core 330
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 655
8-Core 901
98% 778 Pts
64-Core 1,167
72% 1,167 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A530M Graphics
Legend(17AA 3D16) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4679
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.2% Good
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 104
53% 77.9 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 112
84% 101 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL 512GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C02C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 617 66 173 787 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,470
Write 1,361
Mixed 1,160
SusWrite 341
242% 1,083 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 86.3
302% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 566
465% 645 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 204%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 43.7
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 24.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 48 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO7EAD
Typical 83FQ Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83FQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback