Asus H81M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-K (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '18 at 15:45
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1840-$69 7,524 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 96.3 1-Core 67.8 2-Core 104 59% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 99.5 8-Core 112 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500 5,613 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 038E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 3.38 4% 4.38 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 2.87 Splatting 5.96 4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pioneer APS-SL2 Serise 120GB 423 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 990 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 271 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 2311 (A5) Unknown 100 100 6 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 5 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 616 (F2) Unknown 100 100 824 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 0 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0 (FD) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	57.5% Above average	Read 409 Write 280 Mixed 341 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 2.48 69% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 73.9 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 3.59 36% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 67%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 769GB free Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 101 (03) Spinup time 113 113 25791824207 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4444 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 5 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 16854 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3257 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4445 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4445 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 219044446244 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 5 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 6 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 43461	47.3% Average	Read 82.2 Write 82.7 Mixed 79.8 61% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.58 4K Mixed 0.33 78% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 74%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 285GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 134 4025 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4660 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 4 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10852 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1863 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 234 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4660 (C2) HDA temperature 102 90 41 (C4) Reallocation count 196 196 4 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 18 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 11456 (C8) Write error rate 200 176 0	56.8% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 98.3 Mixed 88.2 72% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.31 96% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 0423 Team--Elite-1333 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.8% Average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.6 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 15.7 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 53.1 75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1,187x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	505x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	492x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	566x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	480x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	169x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	150x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	91x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16