Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z890-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z890-P  (all builds)
Memory117.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20241022
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 29 '24 at 02:54
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K-$590
LGA1851, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
130% Outstanding
Memory 62.3
1-Core 238
2-Core 526
134% 275 Pts
4-Core 1,056
8-Core 2,056
184% 1,556 Pts
64-Core 5,260
326% 5,260 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics
Asus(1043 88EF) 2GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 32.0.101.5866
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 38.1
18% 25.5 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,494
Write 1,607
Mixed 1,398
336% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 89.4
310% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,349
DQ Write 1,199
DQ Mixed 1,165
904% 1,238 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 236%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
23GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.9
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.7
15% 17 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M323R4GA3DB0-CWMOD 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 59.1
MC Write 49.6
MC Mixed 52.4
153% 53.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 45.1
SC Mixed 29.5
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 138%
Great: 205%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 60 21.5" 1920 1009 SAC952D LED MONITOR
Typical PRIME Z890-P Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 341%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 474%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z890-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $1,650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback