Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z890-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z890-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20241022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '24 at 23:23
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K-$400
LGA1851, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 66.8
1-Core 192
2-Core 401
111% 220 Pts
4-Core 792
8-Core 1,544
138% 1168 Pts
64-Core 3,266
202% 3,266 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 154
Parallax 155
127% 155 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 133
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S250G 250GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI03105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,150
Write 1,637
Mixed 1,431
386% 1,740 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 56.7
296% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 1,233
DQ Mixed 457
455% 701 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 274%
WD Blue SN580 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 281010WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,808
Write 3,844
Mixed 2,639
764% 3,430 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 86.6
322% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 2,203
DQ Write 1839
DQ Mixed 2,033
1,519% 2025 MB/s
Poor: 288% Great: 589%
WD WD120EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 175
Write 178
Mixed 99.5
112% 151 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.5
420% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 93.4
Mixed 80.3
72% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
296GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 135
Mixed 69.2
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6400 C32 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 68.1
MC Write 63
MC Mixed 59.9
182% 63.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 63.3
SC Mixed 34.3
115% 40.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 165%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING Z890-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 298%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 412%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z890-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 128% - Outstanding Total price: $1,540
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback