Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '18 at 23:19
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 212 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 570 60% 479 Pts	64-Core 583 36% 583 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.5% Below average	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 81.3 Parallax 70.1 26% 61.3 fps	MRender 73.3 Gravity 74.7 Splatting 77.4 62% 75.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13330 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 934 (B1) Unknown 94 94 64 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 56 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 22 (F1) Unknown 99 99 26764516162
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 42GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4009 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 387 (B1) Unknown 97 97 54 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 53 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 116 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22766060801	113% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 405 Mixed 414 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 96.1 4K Mixed 47.2 180% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 123 139% 238 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 196 3166 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 36 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 341 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 19 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3098 (C2) HDA temperature 119 115 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69.6% Good	Read 117 Write 126 Mixed 110 88% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.27 96% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 84%
TrekStor DS maxi g.u 2TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 231GB free, PID 001b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 38.9 Write 41.9 Mixed 38.8 52% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.36 98% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 2,501 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.3% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13.4 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.8 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 699 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	184x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	93x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	76x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	28x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	41x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16