Lenovo F0AV002LSP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo F0AV002LSP  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20161012
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '18 at 19:47
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 111
49% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 183
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics + R7 A260 Dual Graphics
Legend(17AA 368F) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.352.1013.0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 8.57
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 11.5
7% 9.5 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 9.43
Splatting 8.09
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 179
Write 89.8
Mixed 123
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.19
50% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 109%
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB
12GB free, PID 1653
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.8% Terrible
Read 17.1
Write 5.71
Mixed 7.35
11% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.37
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.8%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170ME68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback