Asrock 880GM-LE FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 880GM-LE FX  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '18 at 07:32
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 74.3
39% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 71.5
8-Core 85.4
10% 78.4 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5600
PwrHis(1787 2300) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.0.0
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 7.73
Parallax 9.06
6% 8.09 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 8.17
Splatting 7.96
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 66.7
67% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.25
63% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$30
88GB free
Firmware: PBBOC60N Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 52
Write 37.2
Mixed 4.43
22% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.28
66% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-002.A00G 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 880GM-LE FX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GM-LE FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback