Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '18 at 12:06
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 111
53% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 443
39% 330 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.821.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.54 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 303
Write 315
Mixed 257
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 19.6
93% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.8
DQ Write 61.7
DQ Mixed 19.8
23% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,033
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback