Today's hottest deals

Asus X550CC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550CC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550CC
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '18 at 00:03
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 85.3
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 125
59% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2932
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.09 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.43
4% 4.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
483GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0R2J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 68
Mixed 67.3
52% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.19
60% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550CC Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback