HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '18 at 07:46
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 208 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 472 52% 409 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB; MSI GT 1030 2G LP OC CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.5 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 20.4 16% 18.5 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 20.7 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 128 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 20 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 54 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 373128942	82.4% Excellent	Read 510 Write 412 Mixed 422 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 19 111% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.1 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 66.6 61% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 124%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 131 8266 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18413 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 35705 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 550 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 200 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 176 176 74627 (C2) HDA temperature 120 84 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.3% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 95.4 Mixed 87.9 70% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.15 78% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 667GB free Firmware: MEAOA5C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 111 (03) Spinup time 142 142 47280685489 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1829 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 32 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8650 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1629 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1841 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1841 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 223338954783 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	52.5% Above average	Read 83.7 Write 99.2 Mixed 74.3 64% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.37 77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF M378B5273EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.1% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,466x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,466x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	797x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,922x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	726x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	489x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	266x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	64x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	57x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16