HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 15:14
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 492
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 511
Write 249
Mixed 308
78% 356 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 20.3
88% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 55
89% 171 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback