Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 09:24
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 140
59% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 284
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Device(1B0A 90B5) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 5.72
6% 6.46 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 5.43
5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC12 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 0203 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 97.9
Write 70.1
Mixed 81.9
18% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 1.61
30% 7.24 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 44%
Samsung PM81 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 113
Write 239
Mixed 30.9
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 9.02
53% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 35.4
DQ Write 20.1
DQ Mixed 3.9
9% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron-002C 18JSF51272AZ-1G4K1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback