Acer Aspire E1-572G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-572G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HW
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '16 at 04:25
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 20
2-Core 30.8
29% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 48.2
8-Core 53.3
7% 50.8 Pts
64-Core 53.3
3% 53.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0775) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.2973
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 1.06
1% 1.08 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Optical disk drive 1TB
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.5% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 62.7
Mixed 74.2
53% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.04
22% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-572G Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-572G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback