Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090806
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 28 '18 at 21:41
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 40
2-Core 78.1
44% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 77.4
8-Core 79
10% 78.2 Pts
64-Core 81.6
5% 81.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
(pe64) ATI Radeon HD 4200
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.12
0% 0.68 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.07
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.72 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
643GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 149
Mixed 26.4
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
55% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 1.9
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA785GT-UD3H Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback