Today's hottest deals

MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121127
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 31 '18 at 11:57
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 100
48% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 191
27% 197 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Gigabyte(1458 2551) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 13.6
8% 12.9 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 9.07
Splatting 17.3
11% 13 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120GC1DA16T2-T 120GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 307
Write 102
Mixed 138
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 13.2
74% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 12.3
22% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-2GBXL0 8GB
1467, 1467, 1467, 1467 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 13.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870A-G54 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback