None BIPV10-IAP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	None BIPV10-IAP (all builds)
Motherboard	None BIPV10-IAP
Memory	0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, ,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '18 at 14:55
Run Duration	538 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 47.8 1-Core 7.4 2-Core 14.6 19% 23.3 Pts	4-Core 15.1 8-Core 13.4 2% 14.2 Pts	64-Core 15.6 1% 15.6 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37 7,072 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM0B1J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1371 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 11535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 16763 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1328 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 21 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 69 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 121537 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 231929085997 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 59 59 16580 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 181 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0		Read 70.1 50% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 57%
Kingston DT Mini Fun G2 4GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1647 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	4.18% Terrible	Read 17.9 Write 3.75 Mixed 6.27 9% 9.29 MB/s	4K Read 3.08 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 13% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.18% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.88% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.88% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

None BIPV10-IAP

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)