Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4383

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4383  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Inagua
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '16 at 23:16
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-50
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Memory 38.9
1-Core 12.2
2-Core 17.9
18% 23 Pts
4-Core 18.2
8-Core 17.5
2% 17.9 Pts
64-Core 22.9
1% 22.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250M
Legend(17AA 397C) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.862.6.5000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.75
0% 0.78 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 0.35
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hfs250g3 2TND-3112A 250GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 249
Write 235
Mixed 252
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 18.1
64% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 79.6
DQ Write 55.4
DQ Mixed 31.8
33% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.82% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.8
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.5
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.82%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4383 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4383

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback