Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180413
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '18 at 16:09
Run Duration	320 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 127 2-Core 175 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 754 64% 552 Pts	64-Core 1,010 62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 34CA) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 334.89 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	8.52% Terrible	Lighting 11.5 Reflection 9.69 Parallax 5.38 9% 8.87 fps	MRender 9.52 Gravity 9.23 Splatting 6.87 7% 8.54 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.52% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 231GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 169143531 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1013 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 48695057 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27725 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1013 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 87 87 13 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032839 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 52 471269399 (C2) HDA temperature 23 48 47244640279 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 37 23 169143531 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 128449586951879 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1547142074 (F2) Unknown 100 253 974187293	55.5% Above average	Read 98.1 Write 95.4 Mixed 53.8 61% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.63 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 58%
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91 6,085 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 251GB free (System drive) Firmware: GJ002J Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1175 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1942 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 111 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 1306 (0A) Spinup retry count 138 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1940 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 505 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 530 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 39553 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044118562 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 32 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 37 (DE) Loaded hours 98 98 942 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 297 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	31.1% Below average	Read 38.2 Write 69.7 Mixed 11.7 29% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.32 79% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 48%
Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB-$70 1,727 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 149GB free Firmware: 3.42 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 57 39 220933900 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1837 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 698365298 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27715 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2114 (C2) HDA temperature 22 58 34359738390 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 39 220933900 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	31.6% Below average	Read 55.1 Write 54.9 Mixed 19.7 32% 43.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.4 97% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 32%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 827GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 136 Write 135 Mixed 70 140% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.31 72% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 49%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 0304 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	6.73% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 7.34 Mixed 9.78 14% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.81 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 29% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.73% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-006.A00G 1x8GB 278 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.5% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,464x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,008x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	736x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	654x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	716x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	285x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16