Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2215
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 03 '18 at 20:13
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10 PRO-7800B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 121
50% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 205
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2215) 960MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 8.65
Parallax 12.3
7% 9.98 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 9.57
Splatting 8.61
7% 8.34 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MAM-1K1 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 395
Write 237
Mixed 303
69% 312 MB/s
4K Read 9.61
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 5.99
53% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 6.76
DQ Write 34.2
DQ Mixed 11
11% 17.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 76%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: GX2M Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 157
Mixed 174
124% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 5.25
4K Mixed 0.34
169% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.3% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 14
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback