PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z640 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212A |
Memory | 44.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170316 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 16 '18 at 18:48 |
Run Duration | 99 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
62.5%
Good
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.3%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
59%
Above average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 114x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 108x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 101x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 156x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 120x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 64x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $509 |