ECS A55F-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardECS A55F-M3  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '18 at 02:10
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3650 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 81.5
42% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 161
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Elitegroup(1019 7BB5) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 2.84
2% 3.4 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 5.09
3% 3.79 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 57.6
Write 48.7
Mixed 59.5
42% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.25
54% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 51%
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 1TB
355GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 32
Mixed 32.2
42% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.2
20% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13%
Great: 45%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB
98GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 30.6
Mixed 24
36% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.2
54% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINGBOX-1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.8% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55F-M3 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A55F-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback