Biostar Hi-Fi A85W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi A85W  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '18 at 19:18
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 114
54% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 205
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gainward(10B0 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 5.31
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 15
Splatting 12.8
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 293
Write 15.2
Mixed 28.8
24% 112 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 1
38% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB
218GB free
Firmware: V54OA7EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 34.4
Write 41.5
Mixed 26
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.25
73% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 40%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
64GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 13.6
Write 35
Mixed 33.2
40% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.45
4K Mixed 0.17
22% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 19%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 500GB
30GB free, PID 3000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 30.9
Mixed 16
32% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.32
54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA1339.M16 CT102464BA1339.M16 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi A85W Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi A85W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback