User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHyrican H110M PRO-D
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160714
Uptime12.7 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 10:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-6700-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.3% Very good
SC Int 94.6
SC Float 98.9
SC Mixed 103
79% 98.8 Pts
QC Int 348
QC Float 384
QC Mixed 349
82% 360 Pts
MC Int 499
MC Float 589
MC Mixed 562
82% 550 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$208
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.6% Average
Lighting 118
Reflection 152
Parallax 175
43% 148 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 117
Splatting 115
49% 118 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 65%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$40
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1230C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$42
606GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
77% Very good
Read 138
Write 131
Mixed 116
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.1
38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback