Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	9.42% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5140 168 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 50.5 1-Core 24.2 2-Core 46.7 28% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 93.4 8-Core 100 13% 96.9 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 147GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.42% Terrible	Read 76.2 Write 64.1 Mixed 69.2 16% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 0.56 8% 4.14 MB/s	DQ Read 4.21 DQ Write 6.23 DQ Mixed 1.92 2% 4.12 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 105%
Scst_bio 1234567890sciaaa 215GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 199GB free Firmware: 220 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.5% Average	Read 107 Write 59 Mixed 79.4 62% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 0.26 4K Mixed 0.42 90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x1GB 1,329 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 8 of 8 slots used 8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.5 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.4 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 32%, 155 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54301stBench 45%, 279 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 349 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	3x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $100