Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350E5C-S06HU
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 23:48
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 87.2
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 106
56% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 168
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 2.5
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.91
4% 4.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 457
Write 185
Mixed 176
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 6.26
48% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 5.04
8% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-054.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback