Asus P5GC-MX/1333

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5GC-MX/1333  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090313
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 03 '16 at 08:36
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$47
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 49.6
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 56.2
30% 45.1 Pts
4-Core 65.8
8-Core 57.4
8% 61.6 Pts
64-Core 69.2
4% 69.2 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.65 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
532GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 116
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.32
122% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 109%
Generic Flash Disk11.18 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 4.52
Mixed 7.63
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.33
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.004
16% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5GC-MX/1333 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5GC-MX/1333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $134
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback