Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130 12,547 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 82.9 1-Core 71.6 2-Core 133 59% 95.7 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 223 28% 215 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D + HD 7000 Dual Graphics 16 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 B497) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 7.62 0% 5.46 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 6.83 Splatting 8.74 6% 6.94 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 558GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 97 98 98 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 158 Write 156 Mixed 129 SusWrite 96.9 100% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 2x4GB 2,242 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 12 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 10.6 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples	2x

GPU
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples	1x
Radeon R5 235AMDBench 2%, 974 samples	1x

SSD
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	1x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	1x

RAM
RMR5030EF68F9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 51%, 2,242 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	1x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $130