Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime25.8 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 00:13
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 70.4
45% 68 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 102
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 67
4% 67 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 34GB
30GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 18 14 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 34.2
Mixed 34
SusWrite 15
7% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 16.4
39% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 15.7
12% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 73%
Virtual HD 136GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 8.2 11 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 67%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
185GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.8 8.7 6.8 8.2 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 28.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 8.1
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.3
306% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
512, 15872 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback