Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG4  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 11:58
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 184
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 363
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 120
Mixed 131
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 20.3
83% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 111
85% 115 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
0GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.4
Write 69
Mixed 53.8
50% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
8GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 71.1
Write 62.7
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 54.3
49% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
120GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 101 100 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 51
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 98.8
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 113%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.3 7.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7
8% 6.7 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 7%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 128GB
31GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 9.5 0.9 7.6 1.1 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 25
Write 22.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 7.4
26% 20 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.5
243% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $146
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback