Average Bench: 19% (222nd of 714)

Based on 24,657 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 6719 Models: AMD Radeon HD 6900, ASUS EAH6950, AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series

Terrible average bench

The AMD HD 6950 averaged 81.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 24.7fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 17.9fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD HD 6950 is just 3.38%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD HD 6950 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 27.2fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 23.7fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 24,657 samples)
Min Avg Max
23 Lighting 24.7 28.6
24 Reflection 27.2 29.6
21.2 Parallax 23.7 26.1
20.1% 25.2 fps
Min Avg Max
20.4 MRender 22.6 24.3
20 Gravity 22.4 24.5
16.2 Splatting 17.9 19.3
16.8% 20.9 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 2461) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 24.7
20% 25.9 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 18.8
18% 21.8 fps
XFX(1682 3125) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 24.1
20% 25.3 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 18.4
17% 21.4 fps
Sapphire(174B 186B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 23.3
20% 24.8 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 17.9
17% 20.8 fps
Sapphire(174B E186) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 27
Parallax 23.4
20% 24.8 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 22
Splatting 17.8
17% 20.7 fps
XFX(1682 3120) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 22.8
19% 24.4 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 17.5
16% 20.3 fps
24,657 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,466,715 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 24,657 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $290 @ launch in Dec '10)
Sapphire(174B 186B) 19% 19% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0B00) 15% 19% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 2307) 12% 19% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E186) 7% 19% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2461) 6% 20% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 21FD) 6% 19% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 2010) 4% 20% ± 1%
Asus(1043 03BE) 4% 21% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3120) 3% 19% ± 1%
XFX(1682 3121) 3% 19% ± 1%
XFX(1682 3122) 3% 19% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3125) 3% 19% ± 1%
Asus(1043 03BA) 3% 19% ± 1%
Asus(1043 03D4) 3% 21% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2460) 2% 19% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E182) 2% 19% ± 2%
XFX(1682 3126) 2% 19% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3124) 1% 19% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3123) 1% 19% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2462) 0% 19% ± 1%
Device(0000 0000) 0% 20% ± 2%
XFX(1682 3127) 0% 19% ± 0%
AMD(1002 2307) 0% 19% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3128) 0% 19% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E284) 0% 21% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 6950 Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $756

Popular HD 6950 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 9 years ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

15 months ago.

pretty good card. no problems so far


Good

2 years ago.

I Use it myself and it does well on older games.


Good

3 years ago.

I use this card and I get pubg 60fps solid on med settings!


Poor

3 years ago.

Ne supporte pas directx 12 et les pilotes vulcans ect..


Good

2 years ago.

its good enough for gaming and cooling is realy good its not higher than 58c and work good


Good

7 months ago.

The best graphics card in 2010


Excellent

3 years ago.

Love it because it is the cheapest legit card anyone can buy.


Excellent

2 years ago.

Still awesome for playing in 1080p medium/high settings in most modern games, excellent in 720p gaming in ultra settings for most games up to 2016..


Excellent

5 years ago.

worked great for many years...still better than any iGPU options


Good

4 years ago.

I have 2 GPU in Crossfire and playing Metro 2033 on Ultra and no problem..... But GPU is 40nm = old.... very energetically ineffective but on 10 yrs gpu is too impresive


Good

3 years ago.

Good cards for collecting, performance is between okay and poor however. It has fallen into the spot where the power consumption and noise is not worth it anymore. Although it helps me save money on heating my room so four stars


Good

8 years ago.

Very good vga!


Excellent

4 years ago.

Extremely reliable for 9 years, performed above expected until now (2019). Ran Witcher 3 and Fallout 4 at least at medium graphics, with extremely rare issues


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback