Real World Speed
Performance profile from 49,975 user samples
32,143 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 39% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 39% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 555
17,832 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 35% Gigabyte(1458 226C)
Worst Bench: 29% Sapphire(174B E271)
Poor: 29% Great: 35%
SPEED RANK: 68th / 555
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
44.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+37%
32.2 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
171 fps Much better texture detail.
+34%
128 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
103 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+82%
56.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
117 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+41%
83.2 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83 fps +3% 80.9 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+33%
146 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
109 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+76%
61.9 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
125 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+35%
92.5 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
89.7 fps +1% 88.6 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
138 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+20%
115 fps -20%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72.7 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+8%
67.1 fps -8%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70.3 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+10%
63.9 fps -10%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
147 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+16%
126 fps -16%
Market Share
Based on 7,343,381 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.45 % Much higher market share.
+73%
0.26 %
Value
Value For Money
60.6 % Slightly better value.
+13%
53.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
93 % Much more popular.
+41%
66 %
Price
Price (score)
$228 $170 Cheaper.
+25%
Age
Newest
32 Months Much more recent.
+37%
51 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
142 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+31%
108 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
138 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+62%
85.1 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
131 fps Much better lighting effects.
+33%
98.7 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
128 fps Much better reflection handling.
+65%
77.6 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $149
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback