Real World Speed
Performance profile from 39,358 user samples
8,103 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Asus(1043 04DB) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 59% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 59% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 21st / 549
31,255 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 60% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 60% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
70.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
66 % -7%
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
277 fps Slightly better texture detail.
256 fps -8%
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
129 fps +2% 126 fps -2%
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
180 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
163 fps -10%
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps +3% 177 fps -3%
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
317 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
286 fps -11%
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
136 fps +2% 133 fps -2%
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
193 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
172 fps -12%
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
192 fps +3% 187 fps -3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
234 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
189 fps -23%
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
93.5 fps -9%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61.6 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
46.6 fps -32%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74.6 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
70 fps -7%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
239 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
180 fps -33%
Market Share
Based on 6,217,100 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.14 % -207% 0.43 % Hugely higher market share.
Value For Money
55.3 % -35% 74.7 % Much better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
86 % -9% 94 % Slightly more popular.
Price (score)
$529 -42% $304 Much cheaper.
30 Months 0% 30 Months 0%
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
233 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
214 fps -9%
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
170 fps +2% 167 fps -2%
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
213 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
198 fps -8%
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
159 fps +1% 157 fps -1%

The AMD R9 390X is a rebadged power hungry (350W+) 290X. The 390X has a slightly increased GPU clock speed, a significantly increased memory speed and a higher minimum VRAM of 8GB but it shares the same core GPU hardware. Looking at the overclocked performance differences between the older 290X and the 390X shows that the two cards are approximately the same, which comes as no surprise considering that the 390X is actually just a factory overclocked 290X. Smart shoppers obviously won't be happy to pay AMD a premium of around $100 simply for overclocking a two year old 290X. That said the 390X does offer stellar performance, particularly at 4K resolutions and if prices drop significantly it could become a strong contender. We only have one MSI sample benchmark for the 390X so far so we will revisit this GPU when we have a better sample of all the available cards. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $112
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback