Real World Speed
Performance profile from 256,380 user samples
224,605 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% MSI(1462 3302)
Worst Bench: 82% Nvidia(10DE 119D)
Poor: 82% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 12th / 550
31,775 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 69% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 58% XFX(1682 9390)
Poor: 58% Great: 69%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 550
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
98.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+51%
65.2 % -51%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
308 fps Better texture detail.
+22%
253 fps -22%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
199 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+59%
125 fps -59%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
284 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+75%
162 fps -75%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
224 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
176 fps -27%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
358 fps Better peak texture detail.
+26%
284 fps -26%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
214 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+62%
132 fps -62%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
317 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+85%
171 fps -85%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
246 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+32%
186 fps -32%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
204 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+8%
189 fps -8%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
121 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+29%
93.5 fps -29%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
79.2 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+70%
46.6 fps -70%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.2 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+40%
70 fps -40%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93.5 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+53%
61 fps -53%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
129 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+26%
102 fps -26%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81.4 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+51%
53.9 fps -51%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+77%
51.9 fps -77%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
124 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+22%
102 fps -22%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
232 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+29%
180 fps -29%
Market Share
Based on 6,867,838 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.7 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,170%
0.37 % -1,170%
Value
Value For Money
88.8 % Better value.
+20%
73.8 % -20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
177 % Hugely more popular.
+84%
96 % -84%
Price
Price (score)
$430 -29% $304 Cheaper.
+29%
Age
Newest
19 Months Much more recent.
+39%
31 Months -39%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
354 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+67%
212 fps -67%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
317 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+92%
165 fps -92%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
310 fps Much better lighting effects.
+61%
193 fps -61%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
286 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+86%
154 fps -86%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2018 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $210AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $53Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $220SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback