Real World Speed
Performance profile from 54,562 user samples
34,777 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 38% EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
Worst Bench: 30% Zotac(19DA 3265) 2GB
Poor: 30% Great: 38%
SPEED RANK: 55th / 542
19,785 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 51% Asus(1043 04E3)
Worst Bench: 40% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 40% Great: 51%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
34.8 % -36% 47.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
119 fps -45% 173 fps Much better texture detail.
+45%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
85.2 fps -22% 104 fps Faster multi rendering.
+22%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
114 fps -4% 118 fps +4%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
76.2 fps -13% 86.4 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+13%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
137 fps -42% 195 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+42%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
91.2 fps -22% 111 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+22%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
126 fps -1% 127 fps +1%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
82.6 fps -15% 94.9 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+15%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
128 fps -10% 141 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+10%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52.8 fps -44% 75.8 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+44%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
78.7 fps -8% 84.7 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+8%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
167 fps -9% 182 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+9%
Market Share
Based on 4,087,480 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.01 % Hugely higher market share.
+120%
0.46 % -120%
Value
Value For Money
50.6 % -40% 70.7 % Much better value.
+40%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
59 % -56% 92 % Much more popular.
+56%
Price
Price (score)
$209 -4% $200 +4%
Age
Newest
48 Months -50% 24 Months Much more recent.
+50%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
106 fps -36% 144 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+36%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
83.1 fps -71% 142 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+71%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
97.5 fps -35% 132 fps Much better lighting effects.
+35%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
76.3 fps -69% 129 fps Much better reflection handling.
+69%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $233AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $278Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback