Average Bench: 66.1% (28th of 555)

Based on 1,204 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 67B9 Models: AMD Radeon R9 200, AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v2.0), ASUS R9 295X2

Above average average bench

The AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled) averaged 33.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 192fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 171fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled) is just 10.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 152fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 122fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,204 samples)
Min Avg Max
159 Lighting 192 211
137 Reflection 152 160
213 Parallax 264 295
67.5% 203 fps
Min Avg Max
113 MRender 122 127
160 Gravity 171 181
160 Splatting 172 180
65.2% 155 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
AMD(1002 1B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Lighting 199
Reflection 158
Parallax 277
70% 211 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 177
Splatting 180
68% 161 fps
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Lighting 200
Reflection 149
Parallax 278
71% 209 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 179
Splatting 172
67% 158 fps
AMD(1002 1B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Lighting 199
Reflection 154
Parallax 289
72% 214 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 173
Splatting 173
66% 157 fps
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.10.3
Lighting 200
Reflection 156
Parallax 272
70% 209 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 174
Splatting 174
66% 157 fps
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Lighting 197
Reflection 152
Parallax 267
69% 205 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 175
Splatting 175
66% 158 fps
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Lighting 196
Reflection 155
Parallax 272
69% 208 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 173
Splatting 175
66% 157 fps
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Lighting 199
Reflection 154
Parallax 264
69% 205 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 174
Splatting 176
66% 157 fps
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 29.5
9% 33.8 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 172
Splatting 170
65% 155 fps
1,204 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 7,366,688 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 1,204 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
AMD(1002 1B2A) 48% 66% ± 6%
AMD(1002 0B2A) 46% 66% ± 8%
Asus(1043 0484) 5% 65% ± 10%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled) Builds (Compare 2,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $344

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,543

Popular R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled) compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.

 Comments

555 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $145
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $206SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback