Average Bench: 3.29% (485th of 714)

Based on 5,672 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0DE5 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 530 averaged 96.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 3.92fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 5.55fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 530 is just 0.46%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 530 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 5.83fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 1.41fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,672 samples)
Min Avg Max
3.66 Lighting 3.92 4.1
4.7 Reflection 5.83 6.8
1 Parallax 1.41 2
3.2% 3.72 fps
Min Avg Max
5.3 MRender 5.55 5.7
4.2 Gravity 4.35 4.6
3.2 Splatting 3.25 3.44
3.43% 4.38 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Device(1B0A 90A3) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5
4% 4.93 fps
Asus(1043 839A) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.43 fps
Sapphire(174B 7162) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
Asus(1043 839B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
Asus(1043 839B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1.9
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Zotac(19DA 5162) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Asus(1043 839B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
MSI(1462 230A) 1GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.6
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.33 fps
Device(1B0A 90A3) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 0.7
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.9 fps
5,672 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,479,485 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 5,672 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Device(1B0A 90A3) 29% 3% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 7162) 18% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 839B) 15% 3% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90A1) 11% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 839A) 7% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 230A) 6% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D 809B) 6% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 5162) 3% 3% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 2% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 230D) 1% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 230C) 0% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D 809A) 0% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2309) 0% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0828) 0% 3% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 530 Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $165

Popular GeForce GT 530 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

18 months ago.

Only reason to use this is if you have no other GPU


Good

4 years ago.

old but powerfull for low\med req games in minimal with a lb oc you will play borderlands 2 in medium settings at around 50/40 fps..... my granny aprov


Terrible

4 years ago.

it really brings down my gaming experience


Terrible

5 years ago.

Awful GPU. Had this bundled with an FX-8100 eight core back in 2012. Fits great with any low-end CPU from 10-12 years ago, but definitely not an FX-8100 in 2012.


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback