Asus G10AC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus G10AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G10AC
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130625
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 04:25
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-4570-$210
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.8% Good
SC Int 88.7
SC Float 79.5
SC Mixed 91.6
69% 86.6 Pts
QC Int 331
QC Float 354
QC Mixed 331
77% 338 Pts
MC Int 333
MC Float 352
MC Mixed 269
48% 318 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$470
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Lighting 221
Reflection 143
Parallax 438
93% 267 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 143
Splatting 197
66% 161 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 140%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$108
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 479
Write 392
Mixed 293
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 35.2
134% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 198
182% 280 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
140GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 3,376
Write 53.5
Mixed 99
844% 1,176 MB/s
4K Read 418
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3.2
17,800% 141 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$60
451GB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 3,379
Write 52
Mixed 88.3
841% 1173 MB/s
4K Read 423
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.4
17,938% 142 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 116%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
92GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 3,239
Write 54.8
Mixed 63.5
802% 1,119 MB/s
4K Read 456
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.2
19,400% 154 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$40
244GB free
Firmware: CC44
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 128
Write 101
Mixed 75.7
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 0420 AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: Asus G10AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $305
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $245AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback