Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2698B v3 46 User benchmarks, average bench 60% None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 95.9 2-Core 176 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 603 56% 465 Pts	64-Core 599 37% 599 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 67%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 1.5TB 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.8% Good	Read 382 Write 195 Mixed 247 60% 275 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 34.7 105% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 68 72% 119 MB/s

Virtual HD 136GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.48% Terrible	Read 10.5 Write 19.2 Mixed 17.4 12% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.005 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.14 16% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.48% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 112GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 115% null MHz 512, 32767, 32767, 32767, 15875 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 25.8 88% 31 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 215%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,041x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16