Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2698B v3 46 User benchmarks, average bench 60% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 71.2 2-Core 165 58% 102 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 163 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 67%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB 509 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 17 56 57 59 59 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.5% Below average	Read 102 Write 17 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 41.2 14% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 2.2 82% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 41.7 DQ Write 39.5 DQ Mixed 40.6 30% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 78%
Virtual HD 60GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 51GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 99.6 Write 49.3 Mixed 99.3 18% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 16.6 55% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 41.1 DQ Write 40.3 DQ Mixed 40.9 31% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 28GB 1,633 User benchmarks, average bench 56% null MHz 1024, 27648 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 33.6 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.4 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 137%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,041x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16