Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '18 at 19:47
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 80.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 237 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 733 74% 600 Pts	64-Core 814 50% 814 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.9% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 115 Parallax 97.6 84% 105 fps	MRender 97.5 Gravity 97.3 Splatting 101 81% 98.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 240GB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1204B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 3.5 78 30 16 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 512 Write 408 Mixed 382 SusWrite 82.5 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 0.7 42% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 60.2 DQ Write 7.5 DQ Mixed 0.7 9% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$79 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 206 203 206 204 205 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 156 Mixed 87 SusWrite 205 118% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TL48G26S8RRGB16 BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.3% Outstanding	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 30.7 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 35.7 SC Mixed 27.5 84% 29.3 GB/s	Latency 79.1 50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	72x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	32x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	37x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $507

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16