PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 15.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Q67-M DO (all builds) |
Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121224 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 15 '18 at 00:18 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.1
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 14 12 13 15 15 MB/s
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
62GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 98 99 99 100 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
67GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 54 55 54 54 53 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
5GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 16 12 MB/s
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 6x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 3x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 2x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $450 |