Eurocom Racer 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEurocom Racer 2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM Racer 2.0
Memory9.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150122
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '18 at 20:52
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 404
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 133 73 69 69 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.8% Above average
Read 253
Write 243
Mixed 224
SusWrite 106
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 32.1
114% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 108
86% 124 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 118%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
35GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4H0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 52 54 54 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 55
Write 57.3
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 53.3
34% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 60%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
292GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4H0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46% Average
Read 81.2
Write 70.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 79
45% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46%
Great: 60%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB
296GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 12 13 12 16 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 23
Mixed 20
SusWrite 14
27% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Racer 2.0 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Eurocom Racer 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback