Eurocom Racer 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Eurocom Racer 2.0 (all builds)
Motherboard	EUROCOM Racer 2.0
Memory	11.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150122
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '18 at 22:12
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 165 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 433 44% 356 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB 4,026 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 195 207 220 213 126 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.9% Good	Read 250 Write 214 Mixed 225 SusWrite 200 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 31.1 105% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 76.4 DQ Mixed 106 86% 124 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 118%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB 20,023 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 35GB free Firmware: SE0OA4H0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 60 60 60 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 59.4 Write 4 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 59.1 24% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 60%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB 20,023 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 292GB free Firmware: SE0OA4H0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 74 76 75 75 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 80.1 Write 0.2 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 75.3 32% 43.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 60%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 293GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 39.9 Write 39.6 Mixed 31.4 SusWrite 40.5 52% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 14.3 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.8 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Racer 2.0 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Eurocom Racer 2.0

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	6x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	1x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	5x
GTX 680MNvidiaBench 19%, 1,365 samples	2x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	1x

SSD
PM851 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 1,419 samples	2x
MZMPC128HBFU-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 1,498 samples	1x
Vector 150 240GBOCZ $246Bench 89%, 1,607 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6EFR8C-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT325S6EFR8C-PB 04CB AD73I1C1674EV 16GBHynixBench 42%, 2 samples	2x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 4x4GBElpidaBench 53%, 447 samples	1x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16