Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '18 at 13:32
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 581
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2871) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 31.9
21% 27.3 fps
MRender 32.8
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 25.1
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 364 285 281 286 286 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 475
Mixed 449
SusWrite 322
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 58
207% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
420GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 86 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 92.1
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 87.3
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 86%
USB Flash DISK 32GB
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7.8 7.5 8.1 7.4 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 12.9
Mixed 12
SusWrite 7.6
16% 12 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 0215 CMX12GX3M3A1333C9 0215 CMX12GX3M3A1333C9 0215 CMX12GX3M3A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback