MSI 870-C45 (MS-7599)

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	MICRO-STAR MS-7599
Motherboard	MSI 870-C45 (MS-7599) (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100904
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '18 at 13:23
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 630 7,197 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 67.7 1-Core 38.4 2-Core 71.6 39% 59.2 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 133 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.11.1 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Lighting 48.8 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 60.4 40% 47.2 fps	MRender 31.1 Gravity 48 Splatting 40.7 33% 40 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60 4,402 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 90 90 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 231 Write 89.5 Mixed 114 SusWrite 88.5 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 18.3 64% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 60 DQ Mixed 54.8 51% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 45%
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB 1,643 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 148GB free Firmware: BF100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 67 68 68 67 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 68.5 Write 75.5 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 68.1 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-416.A00LF 9905402-416.A00LF 9905402-416.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.8% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.9 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-C45 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870-C45 (MS-7599)

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	14x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 840AMD $150Bench 47%, 5,147 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	5x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	3x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
AM2U139C4P284V Kingston 9905402-532.A00LF TMS2GB364D081138KE 10GBAdataBench 24%, 3 samples	3x
VS2GB1333D4 2x2GBCorsairBench 40%, 889 samples	2x
PSD32G13332 PSD32G13332 4GBUnknownBench 32%, 92 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16