| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160914 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 24 '18 at 18:12 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 48% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.4%
Good
|
70% 121 Pts
|
44% 347 Pts
|
28% 460 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
96.6%
Outstanding
|
101% 127 fps
|
89% 110 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 282 283 278 281 271 MB/s
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
86% 382 MB/s
|
138% 48 MB/s
|
264% 353 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
INNO8G2400S 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
55.5%
Above average
|
57% 20 GB/s
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
50% 80.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 885 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 172x |
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 167x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 85x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 146x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 53x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |