PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z390-P (all builds) |
Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181107 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 12 '18 at 23:12 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
|
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1058 506 305 305 306 295 MB/s
|
128%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
465GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 396 407 403 417 374 MB/s
|
79.1%
Very good
|
|||
56.7%
Above average
|
||||
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
728GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.5 4.5 4.7 4.6 4.6 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
846GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 35 MB/s
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 248GB
199GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 54 13 16 22 MB/s
|
30.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.5%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 5,478x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 3,165x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 2,789x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 2,094x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1,154x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,083x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 114% - Outstanding | Total price: $687 |