| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130918 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 26 '18 at 11:36 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 65% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.3%
Very good
|
65% 108 Pts
|
44% 326 Pts
|
20% 328 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2871) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
|
21.7%
Poor
|
21% 26.6 fps
|
24% 29.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 77 83 87 89 127 MB/s
|
29.5%
Poor
|
27% 123 MB/s
|
47% 19.7 MB/s
|
11% 18.9 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
409GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 73 73 74 76 MB/s
|
43.9%
Average
|
54% 73.8 MB/s
|
164% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B5273EB0-CK0 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.9%
Poor
|
27% 9.43 GB/s
|
26% 9.2 GB/s
|
57% 70.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,012 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 163x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 110x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 83x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 158x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 79x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $211 |